top of page

What Taylor Swift’s “Patient Zero” Gets Right About Antagonistic Relationships

Writer: LPerry
LPerry
2 minutes ago
8 min read

Lianne Perry, MA, MSc., RCC


Mountain landscape reflected in still water, illustrating themes of perception, self-trust and emotional manipulation in antagonistic relationships.
When someone repeatedly challenges your reality, trusting your own perception can become surprisingly difficult.

Sometimes a song lands because it puts words to something you’ve experienced but have struggled to explain. Taylor Swift’s Patient Zero is one of those songs.


When I first listened to it and watched the video, I wasn’t just paying attention as a Taylor Swift fan. My therapist brain kicked in pretty quickly. The relationship portrayed in the song and video contains patterns that will feel very familiar to many people who have experienced narcissistic or antagonistic behaviours in a relationship.


To be clear, I’m not diagnosing a fictional character. A music video isn’t a clinical assessment, and neither is a song. What we can do is look at the relationship dynamics being portrayed, and Patient Zero gives us a surprisingly good opportunity to talk about what antagonistic relationships can actually feel like from the inside.


It Doesn’t Usually Start Out Looking Harmful


One of the things people often misunderstand about emotionally harmful relationships is how they begin. If someone treated you terribly on the first date, you probably wouldn’t stick around for the second.


Instead, these relationships can begin with intensity, attention, charm and a feeling that you have found someone unusually special. Taylor captures that beautifully when she describes him as bursting into someone’s life “like fireworks,” followed by an almost immediate declaration of love.


That kind of intensity can feel incredibly romantic. You may feel chosen, adored and seen in a way you haven’t before. Everything can happen quickly, and rather than feeling like a warning sign, the speed and intensity can feel like evidence that you’ve finally found your person. Sometimes this pattern is referred to as love bombing, particularly when overwhelming attention, affection and declarations of commitment create a powerful attachment very early in a relationship.


That beginning matters because when the relationship later becomes confusing or painful, your brain doesn’t simply compare the present relationship with what you want. It also compares it with what you had. You remember the person from the beginning and how they made you feel, and you keep trying to find your way back there.


Charm and Safety Aren’t the Same Thing


Patient Zero also captures something I talk about frequently with clients: someone can be incredibly charismatic and still not be emotionally safe. Those two things are easy to confuse.


Charm is about how someone makes you feel in a moment. Emotional safety is something you discover through patterns over time. Can this person tolerate being disappointed? Can they take responsibility when they hurt you? Can they hear “no” without punishing you for it? Can you disagree with them without paying for it later? Can your feelings exist in the relationship even when those feelings are inconvenient for them?


Those moments often tell us much more about a relationship than the grand gestures do. The person who can sweep you off your feet isn’t necessarily the person who can sit beside you when you are hurt, take responsibility and repair what happened.


The Car Scene Is Uncomfortably Familiar


For me, one of the most powerful moments in the Patient Zero video happens in the car. What makes Colin Farrell’s performance so effective is that the interaction isn’t explosive. He isn’t screaming or behaving in a way that would make it easy for Dakota Johnson’s character to identify what is happening as emotionally harmful. Instead, the conversation is quiet, controlled and incredibly unsettling.


She has just become ill and collapsed at a public event, yet she begins the conversation by apologizing. Rather than showing concern about why she suddenly became so sick, he turns the conversation toward her drinking. He asks how many drinks she has had. She believes she had one, and he challenges her account.


Then the focus shifts again. The issue is no longer that she became ill. It becomes what her behaviour supposedly did to him. He tells her it’s like she loves “humiliating me in front of everyone.” Suddenly, she isn’t trying to understand what happened to her anymore. She is trying to defend herself.


That progression is such an accurate portrayal of how gaslighting can work. Gaslighting isn’t always someone simply telling you, “That never happened.” It can be much more subtle. Someone confidently challenges your memory, introduces another explanation and redirects attention toward your behaviour. They sound increasingly certain while you become increasingly uncertain, and before long you are trying to explain yourself rather than talking about what originally happened.


There is also a tiny detail in Farrell’s performance that I found particularly striking. As she becomes more uncertain and apologetic, there is a slight smirk on his face. We don’t need to decide what his character is thinking in that moment. What makes the expression so effective is what we, as viewers, can see happening in the conversation: she is becoming less sure of herself while he remains completely sure of his version of events.


Eventually, he tells her, “I thought you were different.” Her response is simple: “Different from who?” For anyone who has experienced this kind of relationship, the scene can feel uncomfortably familiar. People who identify with experiences of narcissistic relationships have been commenting online about how closely the interaction resembles conversations they have lived through.


You can begin a conversation believing you know what happened and, a few minutes later, find yourself explaining, defending and eventually apologizing. Somewhere along the way, the original issue has disappeared completely. That is one of the reasons gaslighting can be so difficult to recognize when you’re inside it. You don’t necessarily walk away thinking, That person just manipulated me. You may walk away wondering whether you remembered it wrong, whether you overreacted, whether you embarrassed them or whether you really are the problem.


Eventually, You Start Questioning Yourself


When interactions like that happen repeatedly, something can begin to change. The problem stops feeling like something happening between two people and starts feeling like something fundamentally wrong with you.


Maybe you’re too sensitive. Maybe you misunderstood or expect too much. Maybe you should have explained yourself differently. Maybe you really are the problem. When blame is repeatedly redirected toward you, you can gradually lose confidence in your own perceptions.


Instead of asking, “Why is this person treating me this way?” you begin asking, “What am I doing wrong?” That shift is significant because once you stop trusting your own interpretation of what is happening, it becomes much easier for someone else to define reality for you.


The Public Version Can Make It Even More Confusing


Another painful feature of some antagonistic relationships is the gap between the person everyone else sees and the person you experience privately. Taylor captures this beautifully when she describes him charming his partner’s family and friends. She initially interprets that charm as another sign of how much he loves her, but the song offers a different possibility: what he really loves is being loved by everyone else.


That distinction matters. Someone with strong antagonistic or narcissistic traits can be extraordinarily good at winning people over. They may be funny, attentive, generous, charismatic and incredibly likeable. Your friends may love them, your family may think they’re wonderful, and people may tell you how lucky you are. Then you go home with them.


That discrepancy can make it incredibly difficult to talk about what is happening behind closed doors. When everyone around you has experienced the charming version of this person, you may begin to wonder whether anyone would believe your version. Worse, you may start questioning it yourself. Hearing, “Really? They’ve always been wonderful to me,” can deepen the self-doubt that is already there.


Both experiences can exist. Someone can be charming and delightful in one context and deeply harmful in another, and maintaining that charming public version of themselves may be very important to them.


Why Don’t You Just Leave?


This is one of the questions I wish we would stop asking people in harmful relationships. Leaving isn’t simply an intellectual decision. You can know something is hurting you and still feel profoundly attached to the person causing the hurt.


There may be love, hope, fear, financial dependence, children, isolation, shame, practical barriers and years of shared history. There may also be a nervous system that has become accustomed to cycles of distress followed by relief. Knowing intellectually that a relationship is harmful doesn’t automatically switch off attachment.


From an Internal Family Systems perspective, different parts of you may also be trying to protect you in completely different ways. One part may know you need to leave, while another desperately wants to preserve the relationship. Another may be terrified of what will happen if you go, while another still believes that if you can finally say the right thing, the person you fell in love with will come back. Those parts aren’t foolish. They’re trying to protect you with the information and strategies they have.


And Sometimes They Come Back


One of the most confusing moments can happen after you finally begin pulling away. Suddenly, the person who seemed indifferent to your pain may become attentive again. They may apologize, reminisce about the good times, promise that things will be different or become the person you have been waiting months, or even years, to see again.


In discussions about narcissistic and antagonistic relationships, this is sometimes called hoovering, an attempt to pull someone back into the relationship after they have begun creating distance. It can be extraordinarily effective, not because you’re weak, but because it activates something incredibly powerful: hope.


Missing Someone Doesn’t Tell You Whether the Relationship Was Healthy


We sometimes treat longing as evidence. If I still miss them, maybe it was real. If I still love them, maybe I made a mistake. If I still want them to call, maybe I should go back. Those thoughts can feel especially convincing when you’re remembering the intensity and connection from the beginning of the relationship.


Attachment doesn’t disappear simply because you recognize that a relationship was harmful. You can miss someone and know you cannot safely be with them. You can love someone and recognize that loving them is costing you too much. You can remember beautiful moments without rewriting the painful ones.


Healing doesn’t require you to prove that every moment was terrible. It requires you to begin trusting the whole story, including the parts you may have spent a long time explaining away.


The Real Recovery Is Often Getting Yourself Back


After an antagonistic relationship, people sometimes expect healing to look like forgetting the person or never being triggered again. Often, the deeper work is much quieter.


You may notice that you don’t automatically assume everything is your fault anymore. You stop rehearsing explanations for perfectly reasonable boundaries. You recognize manipulation sooner, become less interested in convincing someone else that your feelings are legitimate, and start noticing what your body has been telling you. Slowly, your own perception becomes trustworthy again.


That’s a big part of the work I do with clients who have experienced narcissistic and antagonistic behaviours. We aren’t simply trying to understand the other person. We’re helping you hear yourself again.


Sometimes, strangely enough, a pop song and a few minutes of remarkably good acting can help put words to why that became so difficult in the first place.


Joey’s Take 🐾


Australian Shepherd Joey looking thoughtfully out a window.
Joey, quietly keeping an eye on things.

Joey is remarkably good at noticing when something doesn’t feel right. He doesn’t need to explain it away or convince himself otherwise. Sometimes there’s something to be said for paying attention to what you already know.


About Lianne


I’m Lianne Perry, a Registered Clinical Counsellor in BC who works online with clients across Canada. I specialize in trauma, anxiety, life transitions, and helping people recover from emotionally abusive and manipulative relationships. I’m certified in EMDR, a powerful approach that helps people heal without having to relive every detail of the past, and I’m also a Certified Narcissistic Abuse Treatment Clinician, having completed extensive training and certification with Dr. Ramani Durvasula. My sessions are grounded, collaborative, and combine evidence-based approaches with practical tools tailored to each person’s unique experiences. When I’m not in session, you’ll probably find me hiking with my Aussie, Joey, or sitting by the ocean, my favourite co-therapist.

bottom of page